🔗 Share this article

The Journey of a Cult is often characterized by specific steps.

1. The Core Concept

A dominant personality or figureheads present an innovative concept that promises a panacea for struggling players.

So here we are. Plans are in motion to confront the system in Australia. Tensions are rising. Conflict emerges from the sidelines. A lone figure, exposed, shivering, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET displayed prominently as a symbol, has emerged through the lines and is removed with discretion towards an inconclusive loan stint in county cricket.

Remember the start, when the world was still young? The era of early Bazball, of Bazball without brains.

2. Love-Bombing

Cult leaders promise a new start, optimism ahead, camaraderie, salvation among a group who all believe in the method.

What did it represent back then? Just men on a balcony enjoying success. Body art. Forearms. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, The squad often say Bazball doesn’t actually exist, amusingly because if it doesn’t exist, what exactly did I just watch?

However, everyone understands its essence. It’s Harry Brook playing a shot so depraved it defies description. It’s the thrill of Ben Stokes at his peak, a look that says: thoughtful warrior, beard made of wood, natural look, genuinely raw you half-expect to notice and see him playing on the ground shirtless and cradling a wild salmon.

It’s the batsman still being allowed to talk in press conferences, resembling a joyful figure smartly dressed, expressing thoughts like we’re breaking down traditions. And yes, the energy, for a significant period, was only good energy.

3. The Growth Phase

Building period. Cohesion maintained by rote learning of mantras. These principles can appear contradictory as a test of “true belief”.

Does anyone else feel? The backlash, the outrage, the feeling of letdown after the first Ashes Test defeat seems too strong, overdone. England batted badly on the field, as they often do in Australia. They were dominated defensively for a couple of hours as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, carved around by Travis Head playing aggressively but smarter, adjusting to the pitch, a performer excelling with aura.

Now there is the attacks, the anger, the perception of the team as a disgrace. The opinion suggests that losing isn’t enough, they must be humbled, to be cleansed, destroyed, defeated by the vengeful purity of the pace attack, the simple basics of the bowler, marking his wickets with a bashful smile similar to getting a rewarding prize. What will this do to them?

4. The Backlash Phase

Challenges surface from failures in the plan. But the cult cannot admit errors. It begins to thrive on hostility externally.

In truth, half a week out the next match, we’ve entered an intriguing moment in the journey of this thing. They might succeed in the next Test in a blur of adrenal disruption. More likely, failure may follow. Should they fail it seems we could be witnessing the final stage.

Ahead of this, a couple of points to note on the topic. More than two years ago, back in those heady early days, of optimism and energy, an piece was published calling it a phenomenon. Criticism followed, which was helpful since it’s clear a method to show that it’s not a closed group is if supporters react defensively objecting to the questioning of the philosophy.

Recent events in the last few days are fascinating. Criticism of the approach has now become the cult. Social media is furious, disappointed commentators, images of frustrated travelling fans cheated out of three days of cricket, reminiscent of timeshare owners seeking justice.

Meanwhile, exists the larger scene of Australia’s more nuanced more culturally hard-wired exasperation at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, out there saying, your cherished traditions and have fostered and nurtured to distinguish yourselves from the opposition, it’s not serious in the end old boy.

And this is the real point. All movements are similar. The approach was a phenomenon because cricket is a cult. Or rather, the sport in England is closed, a group, a garden party, a restricted environment with centuries of ceremonial past defining it. It has long been where entry is limited. It’s the British pastime of England, the early image-makers. And surprisingly, the country is a phenomenon, a structure of hidden ranks, a monarchy still exists.

England’s cricketers have been enclosed in this environment from a young age. In trying to escape from it, to build a better atmosphere, they are just repeating their past, forming a new circle, a limited community, but doing it this time with a modern squad and a mentor encouraging individuality provided you conform.

Stay present. Run towards the danger. Despite efforts, things stay similar.

With this mind, it is perhaps the moment to offer compassion for the approach, to acknowledge its merits, of which there are many. What does it represent? Encouraging expression. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with